The alt-right is an ill-defined collection of people that 2016 US presidential nominee, “Hillary Clinton”, memed into political discourse as a scapegoat for not having a platform. This, “basket of deplorables”, includes autistics looking for reasons to rope and anti-socials looking to engage in racism because it’s taboo.
The movement is almost identical to 4chan’s /pol/ board as of 2021. Some original alt-right bloggers only mean “alt-right” to mean right-libertarianism, however this usage is not particularly common. The term was technically coined by the neo-nazi, Richard Spencer, who has gone on to disavow the movement for being too self-defeating for neo-nazis.
You can basically tell how alt-right someone is by how much they use the word “cuck”. Alt-righters have been extremely active in trying to grift, sabotage, and monopolize online spaces dedicated to involuntary celibates since 2016. This is not without cooperation from the media, which seeks to paint involuntary celibates as right-wingers in order to diminish their support from mainstream society. Alt-right, incel grifters often hide behind a veil of anonymity, except when they show up to IRL, incel grifting alt-right festivals like Virginfest 2021.
The “right-wing” used to refer to those who occupied the, “right”, side of France’s parliament during the French Revolution, supporting a monarchy against the wishes of most peasants (incels).
The, “alt-right”, was a term coined by Richard Spencer to represent his own style of racist, authoritarian, and self-described elitist politics. Since then, Richard has (nominally) moved more to the left-wing while retaining some of his authoritarianism, something that has angered much of the current alt-right. Spencer no longer uses the term, “alt-right”, to self-identify.
Alt-right and inceldom
Some Alt-Right figures, such as Richard Spencer, Roger Devlin, Gregory Conte, and Andrew Anglin see inceldom as potentially useful to their own type of pro-natalist agenda, as they want people of a particular race to have more sex and more babies. There aren’t many pro-natalist groups out there, so the alt-right kinda hogs the most prominent spot. Any other pro-natalist movement would also likely be sympathetic to incels.
Many alt-righters pedestalize and orbit tradthots such as Lauren Southern. Many tradthots seem to seek to exploit the thirst of many alt-Right men by publically advocating alt-right viewpoints. Alt-right men tend to have a fetish for Asian women (or possibly, Asian women have a fetish for them), or sometimes even marry Jews (e.g Jared Taylor, Mike Enoch). Some argue that the tradcon views on gender issues held by many in the Alt-Right make them women worshipers, but quite a few in the movement (Andrew Anglin, for example) exhibit extreme anti-feminist views that violently oppose any personalitist oriented view of women’s sexuality.
Rise to prominence
The digital MSM lately likes to elevate people that are extremely controversial because they took out too many loans and are trying to pay it off with clickbait. They feign outrage and then give free publicity to the people they pretend to be outraged about. This phenomena may have been the largest contributor to the rise of the alt-right. Without the 30,000 articles on Richard Spencer no one would have heard or cared about him. This disproportionate media attention paid to Spencer also caused many in the alt-right to allege he is “controlled opposition”.
The Incel Question
Here is Grotesque’s response:
“”It’s because most of them denounced us at first, in a lame effort to find a common ground and seem more moderate with their enemies. Because teehee nobody cares about the ugly guy standing in the corner.
“”Then, they realized that incel numbers are growing quickly and there’s shekels to be made. Thus, they are throwing their hat in to be the guy that “helped” us, and become a de facto spokesmen for incels.
- Richard Spencer
- Roger Devlin
- Black Pigeon Speaks
- Left wing
- Dylan Roof
- Political make-up of incels
- Bummer Drummer
This page contains text from an editor (Altmark) who wanted his text released under CC-BY-4.0. William also releases his text on this page under the same license, and so this whole page is CC-BY-4.0, with the exception of content released under other licenses. If using the material under this license, you may credit it as: Altmark, William et al, unless otherwise stated to not credit William, in which case to just credit: Altmark et al. Most other pages on this wiki we declare as unlicensed to re-use outside of here unless expressely stated by email and under the conditions listed in the email.