Incel and casual sex
Most self-proclaimed incels, typically blackpillers and traditionalists, hate the notion of casual sex. They claim it leads to sexual envy and higher male intrasexual competition, which both feed social instability. They argue that, due to female hypergamy (and other reasons), it only benefits high-SMV males and men with anti-social personality traits. Furthermore, they argue promiscuity and the social acceptance of it commonly leads to social ills such as fatherless children, an increase in sexually transmitted disease, and wasted "sexual energy".
There is, however, a small minority of those in the incelosphere who support casual sex. This support often comes from the notion that a highly socially cohesive society built on sharing women and basic resources would help defeat inceldom, like what happened in the Netherlands btw 1992-2017, or in a variety of small Fourierian communes.
Casual sex proponents in the incelosphere argue that women typically only contribute to inceldom when people hoard resources, or during resource scarcity, so as to use their pussy as a survival mechanism or commodity.
Explanation of differences
These differing opinions on the favorability of norms encouraging casual sex are most likely a function of these individuals' own sexual strategies, political beliefs, and attitudes towards cultural institutions such as monogamy. Essentially, the argument is about whether it is preferable that sexual promiscuity is restrained and whether this restraint is beneficial to maintaining and preserving advanced civilizations. Proponents of sexual restraint argue it promotes greater sexual access by men who exhibit pro-social behavior (such as economic productivity and altruism) or are of low social status, and that it promotes marital stability, and thus generally creates eucivic incentives. Proponents of sexual liberation typically dispute both points. They often argue that it is possible to socially engineer women to be more egalitarian regarding their sexual choices and that promiscuity is not strongly related to contemporary social problems.
In evolutionary terms, casual sex is associated with a fast life history strategy of low investment in the nurturance of offspring and high investment into mating effort. In regards to the individual predictors of engagement with casual sex, these seem to include (in both sexes) an unrestricted sociosexual orientation (positive attitudes towards casual sex), an avoidant attachment style (in males), low sexual disgust, elevated levels of the dark triad traits, poor impulse control, and perhaps insensitivity towards/lower levels of hormones and neurotransmitters related to pair-bonding.
Teenage sex and college
Female teenagers feel awkward when discussing casual sex to their parents. This is because many parents condemn casual sex, particularly to their daughters. Brothers also condemn casual sex to their sisters. (See Familial slut-shaming).
For this reason, many females choose to attend a university far away from home.
This page contains text from an editor (Altmark) who wanted his text released under CC-BY-4.0. William also releases his text on this page under the same license, and so this whole page is CC-BY-4.0, with the exception of content released under other licenses. If using the material under this license, you may credit it as: Altmark, William et al, unless otherwise stated to not credit William, in which case to just credit: Altmark et al. Most other pages on this wiki we declare as unlicensed to re-use outside of here unless expressely stated by email and under the conditions listed in the email.