Otto Weininger

From Incel Wiki, the free incelclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Otto Weininger
OttoWeiningerspring1903.jpg
Name: Weininger, Otto
Birth: April 3, 1880
Death: October 4, 1903
Job: Philosopher
Ethnicity: Jewish

By including this public figure on this wiki, we are not necessarily implying they are incel (involuntarily celibate) or are in any way associated with incels. Furthermore, with regards to any actual incels listed on this wiki, inceldom is a life circumstance, not an insult or a movement/community.

Otto Weininger (April 3, 1880 – October 4, 1903) was an ethnically Jewish philosopher, who lived in Vienna-then the capital of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Weininger was staunchly opposed to what he saw as “Jewishness” (which he saw as a negative force inherent in everyone to a greater or lesser degree) and converted to Protestant Christianity[1].

He is mainly known for his work primarily focused on gender philosophy, “Sex and Character” (German: Geschlecht und Charakter) published in 1903. He developed a theory of gender based on secretions of the gonads, anticipating the later scientific discovery of the sex hormones (i.e. androgens and estrogens). That is, mixes of these gonadal secretions “complete” a gender. He was an influence on the German Nationalist Socialist movement, Gerald Steig, an Austrian writer, called Sex and Character “the psychological-metaphysical prelude for National Socialism, including its variants.”[2]

Sex and Character

Chapter 1, every person as bisexual

In the first gender, Otto speaks of sex/gender as a spectrum, with no human being fully male or female, psychologically or biologically. He says this in a number of different ways. He speaks of humans as a mixture of platonic ideals of male and female. Later, he speaks of people as a mixture of Arrhenoplasm and Thelyplasm.

Chapter 2, glands complete gender

In chapter 2, Otto speaks of how sexual characteristics are present throughout the whole body, through every inch of tissue, every cell. That gender variation determines brain size and many other physical states. He argued that every inch of a person provides a gender stimulus to another human. And that every inch of a person must be considered to determine where someone fits between male and female. Otto speaks of cells being able to show how someone fits between male and female. He wrote his book in a time when chromosomes were simply a brash theory.[3], and DNA had not yet been discovered. His theory anticipated the discovery of the androgen and estrogen receptors in human cells. Weininger was arguing that anatomy, from the core, had a large part in determining gender. That soyboys should (usually) have smooth skin, and that tomboys should (usually) have more rough skin. He argues this theory on the basis of the fact that typically masculine men can often exhibit certain feminine traits (such as wider hips etc.) and vice versa for feminine women. Any anatomical deviations from overall gender were therefore caused by variations in individual cells.

Glands theory

He ranks sexual characteristics in order of their ability to produce excitement in the opposite gender. Those characteristics being the least abstracted from the sex glands being the most sexually exciting to humans. He makes every effort to emphasize the importance of gland secretion in sexual determination and attraction.

Most sexually stimulating

Presence of testes and ovaries (Note: not penis/vagina)

Second most sexually stimulating

Physiological characteristics from the secretions of primary sexual glands during puberty (beard, voice pitch)

Third most sexually stimulating

Muscle amount, mental states

Fourth most sexually stimulating

social status, habits, lifestyle, duties

Reception of his work

His work was popularized by his sensational (at the time) suicide. Parts of his work (namely, the chapter decrying “Judaism” and comparing the nature of the Jews to what Weininger saw as the negative aspects of the female spirit) were promoted and used by the Nazis, while they decried Weininger personally, due to his Jewish racial background. Adolf Hitler reportedly stated that “I only knew one decent Jew and he committed suicide…”, quoting the “spiritual father of National Socialism”, Dietrich Eckart[4], whose work shows clear influence by Weininger. Weininger’s conception of “Jewishness” was more holistic than the cruder biological definition used by the Nazis, with Weininger ultimately claiming the Jews are amoral and lacking true free will, like his depiction of women. Thus Weininger conflated what he saw as the negative aspects of “The Jewish Spirit” with what he perceived as the negative aspects of femininity. Though he ultimately denied either true agency. Feminists who lauded his work were mainly gender essentialist types like Germaine Greer. His work is also frequently praised and cited by masculinists, some of whom have been dubbed male supremicists.

Beliefs

He believed all barriers should be taken away from androgynous women to assert themselves in art and science, but that an all encompassing “women’s movement” would drag too many women into it that have not much real capability or interest in male spaces. He argued the only women who truly value and were capable of being emancipated were masculine women, androgynous, perhaps lesbian types. He saw that female sexual liberation would force most women, who naturally don’t have much interest in academic or creative fields-beyond attracting men and expressions of vanity-to write and study. That female entrance into male spaces by non-androgynous women would mostly become an expression of vanity and attention seeking. Although, he saw that most of the women without real interest in art or science would follow the androgynous women’s call for liberation by lashing out at their husbands and, if they are young, at their mothers. He also stated clearly that while, in his view, it was possible for a man to “descend” to the level of a women, he had never known of a woman – however masculine she may be – that was not fundamentally a woman in nature. This meant that, in his view, women were “incapable of genius”.

Suicide

It seems clear that Weininger suffered from a deep melancholy much of his life, and exhibited some traits that indicated he was possibly neurodivergent. Stefan Zweig, an Austrian novelist, described an encounter with Weininger as follows:

“He always looked like one does after a thirty-hour train ride, dirty, tired, wrinkled, He walked crookedly and embarrassed, as if pressing himself against an invisible wall, and his mouth under the thin mustache was somehow tormentedly crooked. His eyes (his friends later told me) should have been beautiful: I have never seen them, because he always looked past me (even when I spoke to him, I did not feel his gaze for a second): all this I understood later as stemming from an irritated feeling of inferiority, the Russian criminal feeling of the self-tortured.”[1]

Otto Weininger committed suicide by gunshot at the age of 23. He almost certainly died a virgin. Upon Weininger’s death, a close friend and colleague of Otto Weininger described him as being very intelligent, but also very ugly.

Quotes regarding women

A superior woman is still infinitely inferior to that which, at least potentially, exists in the lowest of men.
No men who really think deeply about women retain a high opinion of them; men either despise women or they have never thought seriously about them.
The well-known phrase, “Women have no character,” really means the same thing. Personality and individuality (intelligible), ego and soul, will and (intelligible) character, all these are different expressions of the same actuality, an actuality the male of mankind attains, the female lacks.
Woman does not wish to be treated as an active agent; she wants to remain always and throughout – this is just her womanhood – purely passive, to feel herself under another’s will. She demands only to desired physically, to be taken possession of, like a new property.
Woman is merely the result of this affirmation; she is sexuality itself. Woman’s existence is dependent on man; when man, as man, in contradistinction to woman, is sexual, he is giving woman form, calling her into existence. Therefore woman’s one object must be to keep man sexual.
Her existence is bound up with the Phallus, and so that is her supreme lord and welcome master. Sex, in the form of man, is woman’s fate; the Don Juan is the only type of man who has complete power over her.
A being like the female, without the power of making concepts, is unable to make judgments. In her “mind” subjective and objective are not separated; there is no possibility of making judgments, and no possibility of reaching, or of desiring, truth. No woman is really interested in science; she may deceive herself and many good men, but bad psychologists, by thinking so.
The condition of sexual excitement is the supreme moment of a woman’s life. The woman is devoted wholly to sexual matters, that is to say, to the spheres of begetting and of reproduction. Her relations to her husband and children complete her life, whereas the male is something more than sexual.

See Also

References

External links


This page probably contains text from an editor (Altmark) who wanted his text released under CC-BY-4.0. This template is automatically applied to every page we think he ever touched, no matter how minor the edit, even if just a period. Even though he mainly edited the “Scientific Blackpill” page, in order to reduce complexity, William also releases his text on this page under the same license, and so this whole page is CC-BY-4.0. If using the whole page you may credit it as: William, Altmark et al, unless otherwise stated to not credit William, in which case to just credit: Altmark et al. Most other pages on this wiki we declare as unlicensed to re-use outside of here unless expressely stated by email and under the conditions listed in the email.
Protocels

Anthony PerkinsCharles BukowskiCharles FourierChristine ChubbuckDaniel JohnstonFriedrich NietzscheGiacomo LeopardiH.P. LovecraftHenri de Toulouse-LautrecHenry FlyntJoseph MerrickLudwig van BeethovenNikola TeslaOtto WeiningerQuasimodoVincent van Gogh

Protochads

Arthur SchopenhauerGiacomo CasanovaJohn Humphrey Noyes

History articles

Timeless quotes on womenHistory of female sex-favoritismHistory of the incelosphereHistory of the Love-shy RevolutionSexual revolutionLumpenproletariatDC9 Facebook Group

Books

A History of CelibacyCreepFacial Aesthetics: Concepts and Clinical DiagnosisHoney Money: The power of erotic capitalKill All NormiesMännliche Absolute BeginnerMarsSex and CharacterSex and CultureSexual Utopia in PowerShyness and LoveSind Singles anders?The Great UnmarriedThe Love-Shy Survival GuideThe Manipulated ManThe Myth of Male PowerUnfreiwillig SingleUntouchedWhateverWomen As Sex VendorsIncel: A novel

Researchers

Angela NagleAntoine BanierArne HoffmannBeate KüpperBrian GilmartinCarol QueenCatherine HakimDenise DonnellyDustin SheplerEdward DuttonFranco BasagliaJ. D. UnwinJordan PetersonKristin SpitznogleLaura CarpenterMichel ClouscardMichel HouellebecqMike CrumplarOlaf WickenhöferRebecca KarlénReid MihalkoRobin SprengerRoger DevlinScott AaronsonScott AlexanderTalmer ShockleyTim SquirrellWalter M. GallichanWilhelm ReichJyvur EntropyVox DayThe Jolly HereticTahlia