Soyboy is a term used by many sexual trad-cons, alt-righters and other types of masculinists to disparage someone for not being masculine enough. The use of the word "soy" is sort of a joke and implies that the man in question is as feminine as someone who chooses to eat a lot of phytoestrogen in soy products. Not all incels or even incel forums use this term or agree with underlying assumptions about masculinity/feminity.
The term has wide usage outside of the forums mentioned in this wiki.
Representations of soyboys
The stereotypical image of a soyboy in many forums is a man with a beard and glasses opening his mouth and eyes wide-open and in a, "surprise!", face during pictures. This meme came from casual analysis of the facial expressions of male feminist video gamers and college student types, and was deemed to be a sign of submissiveness and femininity.
In a bad academic paper on incels and this wiki it says:
“”Delicate masculinity seems to play a major role in how the movement has been created and is growing.Many members do not feel secure in their masculinity leading to the expression of aggression. This can probably also contribute to the strong female hatred that often expresses itself on the side because one. Part of hegemonic masculinity is to reject the feminine.
While this is true for some incels, a better way to explain this would be that there is a split between masculinist and non-masculinist incels. For masculinist incels, a departure from hegemonic masculinity is a bad thing, and there may be some projected self-loathing. For non-masculinist incels, they do not feel bad personally departing from hegemonic masculinity and their hatred instead comes from women not liking feminine men.
This page probably contains text from an editor (Altmark) who wanted his text released under CC-BY-4.0. This template is automatically applied to every page we think he ever touched, no matter how minor the edit, even if just a period. Even though he mainly edited the “Scientific Blackpill” page, in order to reduce complexity, William also releases his text on this page under the same license, and so this whole page is CC-BY-4.0. If using the whole page you may credit it as: William, Altmark et al, unless otherwise stated to not credit William, in which case to just credit: Altmark et al. Most other pages on this wiki we declare as unlicensed to re-use outside of here unless expressely stated by email and under the conditions listed in the email.