Strategic pluralism

From IncelWiki.com, the largest incel encyclopedia

Strategic pluralism is a theory in evolutionary biology that substantiates on female hypergamy, suggesting that women evolved to evaluate men in two categories: whether they are reliable long-term providers, and whether they contain high quality genes. In the incelosphere, this is called “female dual mating strategy”.

One particular UCLA study for example states that, “a great deal of the evidence indicates two overlapping suites of psychological adaptations in women: those for securing long-term, cooperative social partnerships for rearing children and those for pursuing a dual-mating strategy in which women secure a social partner and engage in selective sexual affairs to gain access to good genes for offspring”[1].

Criticism[edit]

More recently, the dual-mating strategy fell in disfavor in the scientific community for a number of reasons. One reason is that non-paternity rates are globally very low, even though contraceptives and relaxed marital norms should make AF/BB occur much more often if it was natural.[2] E.g. only 3% of all children in the U.S. live with a step father.[3] This means the vast majority obtains both genes and resources from the same man. Nonetheless, the strategic pluralism highlights a trade-off that especially beta women face between conspicuously advertising themselves to obtain 'good genes' (whoring) vs. getting long-term investment from a man of equal SMV. It is a trade-off because very highly quality men have plenty of other options and are thus often less inclined to invest their resources into a female of lower SMV, but highly interested in getting her pregnant (or enjoying the causal sex). One can regard the entire system of state funded single moms (who are singles due to being pumped and dumped by a highl quality male) as an instance of a large scale dual mating strategy with the provider mate not being a particular male but the state itself.

Relevant image[edit]


Dual.png


full



Betabux2.png


Analogous concept[edit]

References[edit]


This page contains text from editors (Bibipi) and (Altmark22) who wanted their text released under CC-BY-4.0. In order to reduce complexity, this whole page is CC-BY-4.0. If using the whole page you may credit it as 'Bibipi, Altmark, William et al', unless otherwise stated. Most other pages on this wiki we declare as unlicensed to re-use by non-copyright-holders outside of here unless expressly stated by email and under the conditions listed in the email.